ジェミナイがエグい - 三流外資系サラリーマン大家のブログ

三流外資系サラリーマン大家障害者農民バイトです。

ジェミナイの進化がヤバすぎる

めっちゃ使える

ワシより10万倍アタマ良い

Assessing Iwade City's Claim

I'm currently focused on dissecting Iwade City's Agricultural Committee's claim. Initial skepticism centers on the alleged "loaned residence" for farming commute – it seems unusual. Furthermore, I'm examining the farming plan, particularly a significant discrepancy concerning the claimed 4M JPY income. This warrants closer inspection.

Analyzing Application Conflicts

I've uncovered significant contradictions. The applicant claimed a 500 sqm plot but admitted near-zero income. Moreover, they refused joint management with parents, residing in Sendai, which casts doubt on the "commuting distance" requirement despite the Kinokawa "loaned" residence. I'm noting potential legal conflicts between the Agricultural Land Act and Iwade City guidelines, and also the permit/denial inconsistencies. The applicant's retaliation claims are under review.

Clarifying Revocation Grounds

I am now formulating the grounds for potential revocation, with primary attention on the legal basis. The focus is on the Agricultural Land Act and Iwade City's guidelines, particularly Articles 3, Paragraph 2, and the "efficient use/labor" criteria. The investigation shows that neither law mandates a specific income or residence distance for a 3-article permit, but rather that the applicant can physically work the land and farm it efficiently. I am also investigating whether the city guidelines are arbitrarily applied.

Evaluating Revocation Reasons

I'm now zeroing in on the principle of equality violation. The inconsistency between May's approval and July's denial, given the same circumstances, signals a potential breach of administrative law. I'm also examining fact-finding errors; the Sendai address shouldn't solely determine residency if the Kinokawa usage-loan is legitimate. Lastly, I'm considering potential abuse of discretion due to retaliation concerns, and the over-reliance on guidelines.